Discover the partnership websiteLiving Atlas of Quality

Share my experience of a place
Share my experience of a place

UBC Aquatic Centre_Case Study Poster

Date6 August 2026

By MJMA and Acton Ostry Architects, the UBC Aquatics Centre redefines accessibility as a core architectural value. From its inception, the building was designed not only to accommodate diverse users, but to celebrate their presence within a shared space. Universal design principles shape every aspect of the facility: the central spine connects competition and community pools with clear, intuitive circulation; change rooms are inclusive and barrier-free; and level thresholds ensure seamless movement throughout. The architecture uses openness, light, and transparency to dissolve hierarchies, making athletes, students, families, and individuals of all abilities equal participants in the experience of the building. Accessibility here becomes more than compliance, it is an architectural language of welcome, belonging, and civic identity.

Resource information

Resource typeUBC Aquatic Centre_Case Study Poster.pdf
AuthorRabih Cheaitani and Tristan Routhier
Copyright ownerLaurentian University SSHRC Partnership Grant
Type of viewpointResearcher
LanguageEnglish
CopyrightCreative Commons

Linked analysis(es)

Case study (2 pages) by Laurentian University Research Site

UBC Aquatic Centre_LU_#19

By MJMA and Acton Ostry Architects, the UBC Aquatics Centre redefines accessibility as a core architectural value. From its inception, the building was designed not only to accommodate diverse users, but to celebrate their presence within a shared space. Universal design principles shape every aspect of the facility: the central spine connects competition and community pools with clear, intuitive circulation; change rooms are inclusive and barrier-free; and level thresholds ensure seamless movement throughout. The architecture uses openness, light, and transparency to dissolve hierarchies, making athletes, students, families, and individuals of all abilities equal participants in the experience of the building. Accessibility here becomes more than compliance, it is an architectural language of welcome, belonging, and civic identity.

Natasha Gregoire