Discover the partnership websiteLiving Atlas of Quality
Image credit: Matt
"The Percent for Public Art program is an example of how policy tries to shape the built environment. The idea is that a small percentage of infrastructure funding is directed toward public art, so that projects are not purely utilitarian. On one level, the intention is clear. It is meant to improve the quality of the environment and add cultural value. But in practice, the outcomes have been mixed. A lot of the art ended up in places like highway interchanges, where people do not really experience it in the way that was intended. That led to criticism, both about the design and about where the art was located. What stands out here is the gap between intention and outcome. The policy is trying to do something positive, but it takes time to understand how to apply it effectively. It shows that improving quality in the built environment is not just about having the right idea. It is also about how that idea is implemented and how people actually experience it." (Adapted from interview material. Edited for clarity while preserving the participant’s voice.)